Home > Can You > Can You Guess Which Vendor Is 'feeble' At Protecting Businesses From Malware?

Can You Guess Which Vendor Is 'feeble' At Protecting Businesses From Malware?

Any reasonable common sense says you don't open anything you are not familiar with, period. Not too bright. A case like this could easily cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. about 1 year ago - by Graham Cluley Target app shares holiday wishlists, personal info with friends, family… and rest of the internet? navigate here

Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 3, 2015 8:14 pmVisitorRedneckwhat happened to AVG, Avast, Norton or a few of the other anti-viruses? Jack Wallen says the right tool for that task is the Debian-based Cyborg Essentials. As always,thanks for bringing us the news of your latest testing. Ultimately, an anti-virus which isn't doing a good enough job of stopping the malware could well cost you more in the long run. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/581699/can-you-guess-which-vendor-is-feeble-at-protecting-businesses-from-malware/

My Bitdefender updates every hour, and uses very little resources which makes it really safe. Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 3, 2015 8:48 pmVisitorSkip PlummerI'm afraid that Norton sucks. Security software's performance and the quality of the service you receive should be much more important than whether your business is going to have to write a cheque or not.

If it makes you feel comfortable, by all means, believe what you want. Or the recent Ebola outbreak, something that was thought by many to be more or less eradicated. Stay up to date with it and you will be fine. Anything older/less than that and Norton slowing down your machine is not the least of why you need to upgrade, but it's a good "canary in the coal mine"….

As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged ow.ly/30XbO0 View summary · Windows 7 News @w7news 4 Jul 15 Minecraft for Windows 10 beta arrives on July 29th launch day - The Verge ow.ly/30WCLN View summary · Windows 7 Help BleepingComputer Defend Freedom of SpeechTechnical Support, Tier 2| Sysnative Windows Update Senior Analyst | Malware Hunter | R&D at Certly | @AuraTheWhiteHat My timezone UTC-05:00 (East. Graham Cluley | July 3, 2015 11:26 am | Filed under: Malware, Microsoft, Windows 114 344SHARESShareonTwitterShareonFacebookGoogleLinkedinRedditWhatsappBuffer Respected anti-malware testing authority AV-Test.org has published its latest report - comparing the performance of

SEO Audit Tools WEBSITE SEO ANALYSIS TOOL Perform an SEO audit and identify opportunities for optimization Domain grahamcluley.com Social Likes SEO Friendly URLs www.grahamcluley.com/2015/07/windows-7-test-feeble/ Title tag Guess which anti-virus is 'much Funny, too, given that back then malware was caught and it wasn't nearly as many computers as you say. Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 7, 2015 6:01 pmVisitorDavid EckardThe number one antivirus is a suspicious user. I can guarantee you, they do not have 24 Computer Stores.

Your experience is so important, quite obviously, that any other experience can't at all be correct. Since Avast came along I've been sticking to the free version of it. Security Essentials gets a bad rap from the still ongoing hate for MS. As it turns out, it is your behavior which determines how safe you are.

Different people are used to different things, too. Personally, I use linux. I have owned 24 Computer Stores across the United States with over 100,000 repairs over 25 Years. Jump to content Sign In Create Account Search Advanced Search section: This topic Forums Members Help Files Calendar View New Content Forum Rules BleepingComputer.com Forums Members Tutorials Startup List

Participate in this market research and go into the draw to win a Lego Death Star, (valued at $999). Lastly, this part: "Thank you for all of the added business" Your attitude displayed here, that you know better than people av-test.org, when you state things that are 100% false, is However, AVG is becoming more aggressive with their AVG Search and AVG Toolbar, AVG PC TuneUp, AVG Web TuneUp. his comment is here I do not trust all virus killer.

Powered by vBulletin Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2017 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. In its report, AV-Test.org describe Microsoft's offering as "much too feeble": An economical option for protecting a corporate network is the use of the endpoint module, bundled in the Microsoft Management Remember folks - price should not be the driving factor when you decide which anti-malware solution you're going to use to protect your business.

Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site.

Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 4, 2015 1:37 amVisitorDavid LWow Graham! Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 3, 2015 7:52 pmVisitorCoyote"Seriously to them I'd say, if your machine is significantly hampered by Symantec, you should take that as the sign it is, it's time I'll refrain from naming any but they exist(ed). https://discuss.hackbusters.com Home KnowBe4 has been running the HackBusters site for a few years now, providing you with trending IT security news.

Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 3, 2015 8:03 pmVisitorAPDid they try testing Vipre to see if they are any good? No, just take a minute to actually READ the article. Play Video CSO Webinar: Will your data protection strategy be enough when disaster strikes? That alone should show even more just how the above works (the word 'heuristics' should by itself, even).

I don't know what Real World Testing They live in but maybe they should spend a month in a Real Computer Store and see for themselves what the TRUTH really is. Microsoft security webpage Maybe, in light of test results like this, Microsoft would be doing a better service to more actively promote solutions from third-party vendors instead. Share on Facebook See all Other Stories From Source Iranian hackers believed to have targeted US dam about 1 year ago - by David Bisson First comes piracy, then comes prison. Indeed, security is constantly evolving and new threats will arise regardless of what some think will be possible at some point. "it can NOT catch 100% of them BEFORE it's known…"

In the past if I had problems with a program and contacted customer service the first thing they would ask was whether I had McAfee installed. I got one of those fake Windows Security viruses where you get crippling pop-ups demanding that you give them your credit card for a full copy of Microsoft Security to clear That's when the product became non- user friendly. I've never had any problems using it and it doesn't slow anything down.

All Rights Reserved. I read about it somewhere, but will have to try to find it again. Vote up0Vote down ReplyJuly 3, 2015 3:32 pmVisitorRaymond StevensToo bad that you can't offer a substantive suggestion for somebody that has owned 25 computer stores and fixed over a 100,000 computers. they are all the worst.

This is basic maths yet something many tend to forget, ignore or simply don't understand (or realise how important it is). Matthew Hackling Awareness Matt Tett Are you on the backfoot? WE GET IT! Webroot and ESET did not slow my computers down and they both have a light footprint.

Seriously to them I'd say, if your machine is significantly hampered by Symantec, you should take that as the sign it is, it's time to upgrade the hardware. The test revealed, however, that this is not to be recommended. Panda & Malwarebytes running at the same time = 99.9999% untouchable.